Skip to main content

Agile In A Non-Agile Organization

I hesitate to say Agile in a blog as, these days, it sounds like I'm mentioning C or Assembly in a programming discussion. That's not to say it's old but more that it has been commented on so many times, it's not worth mentioning. But too often, Agile is described as an "all or nothing" choice. It's not and my experience has bore this out.

Every organization is different. While businesses may be one type of organization, government is another kind. Small businesses are different than large businesses. Small businesses, for example, will gladly take a chance on open-source software and new tools. Their IT infrastructure can be easily modified to handle it. Larger corporations and governments balk at switching approaches, regardless of benefits. It may be tolerated in smaller groups, but not as a corporate standard.

So when "we're going agile" were the first words mentioned at a project kick-off meeting a few years ago, I was optimistic but not convinced. This was a large organization, full of politics, waterfalls and LCMS. Did they even know what going agile meant?

What does going Agile mean?

In its most basic premise, going agile means focusing on individuals and process more than tools, working software rather than PowerPoint slides, customer collaboration and responding to change rather than a schedule. The scrum approach puts this into real terms:

a. Individual responsibility and processes. Everyone is responsible for something and the process around it makes it happen. This works best with small teams.

b. You deliver and show working software for meetings, rather than vague PowerPoint slides.

c. You work with the customer, rather than against them, showing them where you're at and having realistic conversations with them.

d. You deal with change, not as a crisis, but as the norm, knowing that three or five year plans are rarely, if ever, going to be met.

Wait. Stop the Bus.

If you're a small business or a consultant, you may read this and say "duh!" Change is part of life, customers drive business and you have to deliver things (shipping IS a feature) to stay in business; but more than 20 years after the fact, corporations are still figuring this out. This is the first part in a number of posts about how this came about and how it's worked out in my experience.

Proper scrum and agile also usually involves hiring an agile consultant (more $$) to tell you how it's done and perhaps more, how you're doing it wrong. In an organization where politics rule, getting a process consultant hired and more, sharing it with others, isn't a realistic prospect.

In the end, the project that started as agile really came back to a handful of working ideas. I was lucky enough that the PM did like to have small teams. When they tried to make it larger, everyone could see how the wheels fell off the bus. In the next few posts, I'll talk about each one (and possibly add some) and provide the link to the post. But they were:

1. Daily scrums/stand-up meetings focused on current activity.

2. Iteration Cycles were geared towards delivering Working Software.

3. The Retrospective fixes process problems.

And then there were some things in Scrum that simply took people down a long, never-ending set of discussions:

1. What's a Story Point?

2. When does our test team get involved?

3. When do you do a code review?

We found solutions for these too but the path to get there was a bit harder than the others.

We also used Team Foundation Server for the whole thing and while I've worked with Trello, KanBan and other tools, TFS worked REALLY WELL.

If you have comments or have gone through your own experiences on this, please share them in the comments.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FoxInCloud Stats

FoxInCloud sent this link a while back about their statistics regarding visits to their site:

http://foxincloud.com/blog/2017/12/27/VFP-community-lessons-from-foxincloud-site.html



What's interesting here is the breakdown of people. Yes, I think it's understandable that the Fox community is getting older.

Another factor is the growth of the mobile and web environments taking over development. These environments really do push people towards the newer non-SQL or free SQL/hosted environments but more towards hosted storage options like Amazon and Google. A tool like FoxInCloud that helps MOVE existing applications to the cloud inherently competes with those environments.

But FoxInCloud also allows developers to extend their application further by giving them a starting point using Javascript and the basic CSS (such as Bootstrap). If you're not rebuilding your application from scratch, it's certainly a great step forward.

Well, that explains CodePlex...

In a move that will be sure to anger open source (or rather anti-paid software, anti-Microsoft open source)  zealots, Microsoft is planning to buy GitHub.

A year ago, I mused about why Microsoft would shut down CodePlex and how the world needs competing source code repositories to be strong. I'm not the only one per this Slashdot article :
"...people have warned about GitHub becoming as large as it did as problematic because it concentrates too much of the power to make or break the open source world in a single entity, moreso because there were valid questions about GitHubs financial viability...." - Jacques Mattheij

I will be interested in seeing this play out - whether developers jump ship or not. Have all the efforts Microsoft has made in pushing towards open source be seen as genuine or will all the zealots jump ship or maybe even attack?

Microsoft's comment about why they shut down CodePlex referred to how spammers were using CodePlex. Well, GitHub has its own …

The World of Updates Today

I just received an update for Office 365. It certainly includes some cool features - including starting in one environment and picking it up in another environment. In recent years, I've certainly enjoined the use of Continuity on a Mac and in fact, I feel spoiled being able to start a message in one environment (even Google) and then finish it off on another.  This has become some pervasive when we were reviewing our most recent backlog at a client site, a similar feature was added to the current workload.

But with web applications, the trend is to reduce the amount of software on a client machine. I used to have automatic backup for all of my machines (thanks Carbonite!) but these days, many of my machines don't need anything beyond the core OS and some basic applications. Certainly that's the feeling with Chromebooks and even the lightweight aspect of many iOS apps. The functionality is mostly in the cloud.

When you upgrade your system, you expect it to a big update. So…