Skip to main content

The downward trend of media and politics in the US

(note: this isn't a post supporting Trump or the media - this is just a commentary on the sad state of affairs in the US. Politics in the US have been on a downward trend for years, now it appears the media is catching up.)

If the media wants to people to stop using it as a punching bag, literally, they should stop making off-side comments during REGULAR broadcasts.

There are shows that are "pundit" shows - those that are produced to be inflammatory and instigate discussion. These are the shows that everyone expects to be aggressive. This was the entire creation myth for the Fox News networks. But that isn't the purpose of a "news network", is it? Because if it is, then they've gone beyond being a news network and become an "opinion network". Yes, they may have independence but they don't have impartiality and I believe that is the issue. MSNBC started as a news network and are now, by their own admission, a left-leaning version of Fox. They have some right-wing opinion and maybe some impartial coverage on their schedule but generally, they publicize themselves as a left-leaning network.

When a newspaper like the Daily News or Daily Mirror prints a salacious cover, everyone takes a laugh and then moves on.

However, when you have hosts from actual NEWS shows making personal comments as an add-on to their news coverage, commenting on the story, then you've opened the door to this debasement of the media as was seen over the July 1st weekend in the US.

There is always a time for the media to make their own commentary but when reporting the news is not that time. In the past several years, the US media has become increasingly partisan, even on networks such as CNN. This is due to their introduction of hosts and shows geared towards attracting viewers rather than the reporting news. When your network content becomes more about espousing opinions than news, then you can no longer be described as a news network and shouldn't try to.

Consider the networks in countries such as Canada (CTV News) and Britain (BBC). One could even consider the "Big three" networks in the US. At one point in time, you could never determine the political affiliation of a network because their hosts were always independent or at the very least, impartial.

You can't say "We'll keep reporting the news regardless of the stupid things you do" and then say you're impartial because you've effectively given an opinion. If you want to be impartial, then say "We report the news". Opinion should be left for the pundits but when your network is made up primarily of pundits OR when your hosts start making "punditesque" comments, then you've effectively become your own op-ed. Today, even the big three networks have started doing that.

Imagine if the weather network reporters peppered their broadcasts with "because we've been using too much plastic" or "because of the all pizza boxes that were thrown out", when reporting on warmer temperatures. What would the reaction be? I get opinion - I like opinion - but not in my regular news.

Just as Fox can't hide behind the mantle of free and impartial press, neither can other networks if they continue the downward trend they are on. The place for commentary is on comedy or opinion shows, not the news. Even if a network was able to show itself as a melting pot of opinion, such as the PBS opinion or the Crossfire shows of old, that would be a fresh breath compared to what you've got now.

Does that mean they shouldn't defend themselves? If you have hosts that act exasperated by the actions of anyone, you are now reporting opinion, not fact. The point is that they should have nothing to defend beyond their reporting of the facts. Right now, there is no network that can say they do that, with impartiality.

Just as a single opinion show does not a biased media make, a single impartial story does not a news network make. Adding commentary to news slants the story, regardless of the impetus.


Kevin Ragsdale said…
The news networks in the United States have found their niche: confirmation bias. People watch the channel that most confirms for them what they already believe. It's a sad state of affairs, and seems to only be getting worse.

Popular posts from this blog

FoxInCloud Stats

FoxInCloud sent this link a while back about their statistics regarding visits to their site:

What's interesting here is the breakdown of people. Yes, I think it's understandable that the Fox community is getting older.

Another factor is the growth of the mobile and web environments taking over development. These environments really do push people towards the newer non-SQL or free SQL/hosted environments but more towards hosted storage options like Amazon and Google. A tool like FoxInCloud that helps MOVE existing applications to the cloud inherently competes with those environments.

But FoxInCloud also allows developers to extend their application further by giving them a starting point using Javascript and the basic CSS (such as Bootstrap). If you're not rebuilding your application from scratch, it's certainly a great step forward.

Well, that explains CodePlex...

In a move that will be sure to anger open source (or rather anti-paid software, anti-Microsoft open source)  zealots, Microsoft is planning to buy GitHub.

A year ago, I mused about why Microsoft would shut down CodePlex and how the world needs competing source code repositories to be strong. I'm not the only one per this Slashdot article :
"...people have warned about GitHub becoming as large as it did as problematic because it concentrates too much of the power to make or break the open source world in a single entity, moreso because there were valid questions about GitHubs financial viability...." - Jacques Mattheij

I will be interested in seeing this play out - whether developers jump ship or not. Have all the efforts Microsoft has made in pushing towards open source be seen as genuine or will all the zealots jump ship or maybe even attack?

Microsoft's comment about why they shut down CodePlex referred to how spammers were using CodePlex. Well, GitHub has its own …

The World of Updates Today

I just received an update for Office 365. It certainly includes some cool features - including starting in one environment and picking it up in another environment. In recent years, I've certainly enjoined the use of Continuity on a Mac and in fact, I feel spoiled being able to start a message in one environment (even Google) and then finish it off on another.  This has become some pervasive when we were reviewing our most recent backlog at a client site, a similar feature was added to the current workload.

But with web applications, the trend is to reduce the amount of software on a client machine. I used to have automatic backup for all of my machines (thanks Carbonite!) but these days, many of my machines don't need anything beyond the core OS and some basic applications. Certainly that's the feeling with Chromebooks and even the lightweight aspect of many iOS apps. The functionality is mostly in the cloud.

When you upgrade your system, you expect it to a big update. So…