Skip to main content

Note to Microsoft: Focus on Software, not tablets

iPad 2 was announced yesterday and the business and technology world (and mainstream media who bends over backwards for Steve Jobs) stopped and gazed at the double rainbow that is Apple.


I responded there but I thought I would take the opportunity to drill down a bit further.

First, Microsoft should stop trying to be a hardware maker. Their expertise is in software - so they should attempt to provide the BEST applications available in the App Store, even out-doing Apple. Microsoft's forays into hardware with the exception of the xBox have been fairly laughable - not many people recommend their webcams or mice without offering just as good alternatives.

Imagine what would happen if Microsoft actually GAVE businesses a reason to buy iPads or other tablets? Because Microsoft felt that their focus should be on the software - the BUSINESS software.

Where is the MS CRM iPAD client ? That could be Microsoft's killer intro into this marketplace. If they did it right, they could crush Salesforce. Oh, I know, CRM is a web-based product - but it has a terrible mobile interface. Why? Because it thinks it is still in the Windows desktop world.

Apple rebuilt iWorks for the iPad to try and show it as a great "office" tool - Microsoft should take Office and show why Office is the king of Office tools. Excel defined the office spreadsheet - should Apple's Numbers define the mobile spreadsheet?

Microsoft has to realize that the days of their owning the desktop hardware due to licensing is over. Projects like WinPhone 7, Kin and possibly moving to tablets should be treated for what they are - hobbies, much like the AppleTV was. Build the best software for the devices and people will use them (provided you don't kill them with licensing).

Microsoft's greatest strength (and profits) are in tools like Office, SharePoint and others. Their developers rock at this.

Jobs had it right in that Apple's strength is that they have always tried to be the cross-roads between Technology and the Liberal Arts. Microsoft has never been that - they make business software. Period.

So Microsoft should get their own developers making the best damn business software for the platforms they want to support. If they don't want to support the devices that are becoming more popular, then it's a losing business and they should realize they are eroding their customer base.

Consider the Server Tools market, That's a battle with Linux and Unix - and while it's a tough one, it's one that Microsoft currently does arguably well. The majority of small to mid-sized businesses run on a Microsoft back end.

The desktop? I think even the biggest Linux proponents would just as soon say "take it" - the new battle is on the mobile devices. But the one thing we've seen is that what matters on these devices are the "apps".

Want an instant way in here? Find a way to build "Lightswitch" apps for these next generation mobile devices ON the devices themselves. (focus on getting that trademark from someone where you can bully them). Corporate developers would fall over themselves if they could build it - and think of how cool it would be to be able to "build" the application on the device itself. (as long as Apple or other device makers allow you to do this, of course - but there's the in).

If Microsoft wants to keep relevant, they should focus on their strengths, not their weaknesses. This being my last year as a Microsoft MVP, I really wish I had gone to the MVP summit to promote this attitude.

They have started a little bit - the latest contest is to build great HTML5 applications. Great - we already know that Silverlight is not the end game for web-based applications.

And another thing, Microsoft - really?!? "App Store" is a generic term - much like "Windows"? Grow up. They beat you to it - you should have trademarked "Tablet" when you had the chance.

Comments

Alan Stevens said…
Don't kid yourself, Andrew. Going to the summit would not have enabled you to share a message with anyone at Microsoft. After two summits, I have to admit that MS invites MVPs to Redmond to tell, not to listen.
Andrew MacNeill said…
Good point.

I agree that those attending the summit are there to be spoken to. However, I do believe (or like to believe in my little rose-colored world) that the teams at Microsoft would like to do a little more in these areas. I can't see an MS tablet cutting it.

Popular posts from this blog

FoxInCloud Stats

FoxInCloud sent this link a while back about their statistics regarding visits to their site:

http://foxincloud.com/blog/2017/12/27/VFP-community-lessons-from-foxincloud-site.html



What's interesting here is the breakdown of people. Yes, I think it's understandable that the Fox community is getting older.

Another factor is the growth of the mobile and web environments taking over development. These environments really do push people towards the newer non-SQL or free SQL/hosted environments but more towards hosted storage options like Amazon and Google. A tool like FoxInCloud that helps MOVE existing applications to the cloud inherently competes with those environments.

But FoxInCloud also allows developers to extend their application further by giving them a starting point using Javascript and the basic CSS (such as Bootstrap). If you're not rebuilding your application from scratch, it's certainly a great step forward.

Well, that explains CodePlex...

In a move that will be sure to anger open source (or rather anti-paid software, anti-Microsoft open source)  zealots, Microsoft is planning to buy GitHub.

A year ago, I mused about why Microsoft would shut down CodePlex and how the world needs competing source code repositories to be strong. I'm not the only one per this Slashdot article :
"...people have warned about GitHub becoming as large as it did as problematic because it concentrates too much of the power to make or break the open source world in a single entity, moreso because there were valid questions about GitHubs financial viability...." - Jacques Mattheij

I will be interested in seeing this play out - whether developers jump ship or not. Have all the efforts Microsoft has made in pushing towards open source be seen as genuine or will all the zealots jump ship or maybe even attack?

Microsoft's comment about why they shut down CodePlex referred to how spammers were using CodePlex. Well, GitHub has its own …

The World of Updates Today

I just received an update for Office 365. It certainly includes some cool features - including starting in one environment and picking it up in another environment. In recent years, I've certainly enjoined the use of Continuity on a Mac and in fact, I feel spoiled being able to start a message in one environment (even Google) and then finish it off on another.  This has become some pervasive when we were reviewing our most recent backlog at a client site, a similar feature was added to the current workload.

But with web applications, the trend is to reduce the amount of software on a client machine. I used to have automatic backup for all of my machines (thanks Carbonite!) but these days, many of my machines don't need anything beyond the core OS and some basic applications. Certainly that's the feeling with Chromebooks and even the lightweight aspect of many iOS apps. The functionality is mostly in the cloud.

When you upgrade your system, you expect it to a big update. So…