Skip to main content

Note to Microsoft: Focus on Software, not tablets

iPad 2 was announced yesterday and the business and technology world (and mainstream media who bends over backwards for Steve Jobs) stopped and gazed at the double rainbow that is Apple.


I responded there but I thought I would take the opportunity to drill down a bit further.

First, Microsoft should stop trying to be a hardware maker. Their expertise is in software - so they should attempt to provide the BEST applications available in the App Store, even out-doing Apple. Microsoft's forays into hardware with the exception of the xBox have been fairly laughable - not many people recommend their webcams or mice without offering just as good alternatives.

Imagine what would happen if Microsoft actually GAVE businesses a reason to buy iPads or other tablets? Because Microsoft felt that their focus should be on the software - the BUSINESS software.

Where is the MS CRM iPAD client ? That could be Microsoft's killer intro into this marketplace. If they did it right, they could crush Salesforce. Oh, I know, CRM is a web-based product - but it has a terrible mobile interface. Why? Because it thinks it is still in the Windows desktop world.

Apple rebuilt iWorks for the iPad to try and show it as a great "office" tool - Microsoft should take Office and show why Office is the king of Office tools. Excel defined the office spreadsheet - should Apple's Numbers define the mobile spreadsheet?

Microsoft has to realize that the days of their owning the desktop hardware due to licensing is over. Projects like WinPhone 7, Kin and possibly moving to tablets should be treated for what they are - hobbies, much like the AppleTV was. Build the best software for the devices and people will use them (provided you don't kill them with licensing).

Microsoft's greatest strength (and profits) are in tools like Office, SharePoint and others. Their developers rock at this.

Jobs had it right in that Apple's strength is that they have always tried to be the cross-roads between Technology and the Liberal Arts. Microsoft has never been that - they make business software. Period.

So Microsoft should get their own developers making the best damn business software for the platforms they want to support. If they don't want to support the devices that are becoming more popular, then it's a losing business and they should realize they are eroding their customer base.

Consider the Server Tools market, That's a battle with Linux and Unix - and while it's a tough one, it's one that Microsoft currently does arguably well. The majority of small to mid-sized businesses run on a Microsoft back end.

The desktop? I think even the biggest Linux proponents would just as soon say "take it" - the new battle is on the mobile devices. But the one thing we've seen is that what matters on these devices are the "apps".

Want an instant way in here? Find a way to build "Lightswitch" apps for these next generation mobile devices ON the devices themselves. (focus on getting that trademark from someone where you can bully them). Corporate developers would fall over themselves if they could build it - and think of how cool it would be to be able to "build" the application on the device itself. (as long as Apple or other device makers allow you to do this, of course - but there's the in).

If Microsoft wants to keep relevant, they should focus on their strengths, not their weaknesses. This being my last year as a Microsoft MVP, I really wish I had gone to the MVP summit to promote this attitude.

They have started a little bit - the latest contest is to build great HTML5 applications. Great - we already know that Silverlight is not the end game for web-based applications.

And another thing, Microsoft - really?!? "App Store" is a generic term - much like "Windows"? Grow up. They beat you to it - you should have trademarked "Tablet" when you had the chance.

Comments

foo said…
Don't kid yourself, Andrew. Going to the summit would not have enabled you to share a message with anyone at Microsoft. After two summits, I have to admit that MS invites MVPs to Redmond to tell, not to listen.
Andrew MacNeill said…
Good point.

I agree that those attending the summit are there to be spoken to. However, I do believe (or like to believe in my little rose-colored world) that the teams at Microsoft would like to do a little more in these areas. I can't see an MS tablet cutting it.

Popular posts from this blog

Well, that explains CodePlex...

In a move that will be sure to anger open source (or rather anti-paid software, anti-Microsoft open source)  zealots, Microsoft is planning to buy GitHub . A year ago, I mused about why Microsoft would shut down CodePlex and how the world needs competing source code repositories to be strong. I'm not the only one per this Slashdot article  : "...   people have warned about GitHub becoming as large as it did as problematic because it concentrates too much of the power to make or break the open source world in a single entity, moreso because there were valid questions about GitHubs financial viability...." - Jacques Mattheij I will be interested in seeing this play out - whether developers jump ship or not. Have all the efforts Microsoft has made in pushing towards open source be seen as genuine or will all the zealots jump ship or maybe even attack? Microsoft's comment about why they shut down CodePlex referred to how spammers were using CodePlex. Well, GitHub

Attending Southwest Fox 2019 could change your life - Find out how

Southwest Fox is coming up in October and as I do every year, I spoke with the organizers Rick , Doug and Tamar on the FoxShow. Deadlines for Southwest Fox: Super-saver price (before July 1): $695 Early-bird price (before August 1): $770 Regular price (August 1 and later): $820 This year, I took a different approach with separate shows for each organizer but the main message is still the same : July 1st is their Go/No-Go date. Conferences don't talk about this very often. I don't think developers really question if Apple will hold their WWDC in June or Microsoft will hold their Build conference - but that's because those conferences are vendor-led. Southwest Fox is a community-driven conference - it's not driven by a company with an agenda. Listen to the interviews and you can hear how important each of the organizers feel the live connection between speakers and among attendees.

Virtual FoxFest - A New Way to Conference

If you haven't been keeping up with the news around the Fox community, the Southwest Fox conference has gone digital now showing up as  Virtual FoxFest .  At $49, it's a steal and a great way to learn some new ideas and get inspired. While the reasoning for this change is fairly obvious with the year of COVID - for me, this is something that has been a long time coming. I appreciate many people's needs for a physical conference but the world is very large and it's difficult to get people from around the world into a single physical location. I recently attended a single-track conference via YouTube (a Quasar conference). YouTube's Live stream provided a very handy way to watch, rewind and communicate with people online. While Tamar, Doug and Rick are still making decisions related to the streaming platform, there are lots of great options available. I'm really looking forward to it. The FoxPro community has also really felt its international roots