Skip to main content

Opinion: RIP Slate, Courier - and what might be missing in the Microsoft tablet strategy

Last week, there was quite a blow to the entire Windows 7 tablet business. HP dropped the Slate (less than a month after its internal PR push) and then Microsoft formally confirmed and killed the Courier project, a potentially game-changing Windows-based tablet, or was it?

The first thing that came to mind, unfortunately, was that while Windows 7 supports gesture-based input, it is more useful in a desktop environment (like the HP TouchSmart). I'm using Windows 7 and from a laptop and desktop, it completely rocks. I was in a business presentation two weeks ago and one of the Microsoft reps pulled out their tablet and used it quick effectively. But the Microsoft tablets (from Toshiba among others) have always been focused on the business end and putting your desktop applications into a pen-based environment.

Today's tablets (or the basic hype around them), on the other hand, are more focused on consumer or "lifestyle" use. I've tried Chromium on a laptop and was left less than impressed. I'm still waiting to see a real "Android" tablet. But Android is based on a phone OS, much like the iPad.

Based on the new reality of how tablets are being positioned, maybe Windows 7 on a tablet simply doesn't offer a truly new experience that tablet users are expecting. So why not build it on Windows Phone 7?

That could be the right approach, right? But the Courier project was apparently based on that operating system. So why was it killed?

Too small? At a reported 5x7 side, it could have been perceived as too much of a toy compared to the larger tablets but, I'm not sold on this. A tablet that could fold up? At 5x7, that makes it instantly carry-friendly but as a business device, maybe that's where it was failing.

Whereas Apple has only ever tried to serve one master, itself (or the one known as Steve), Microsoft is always trying to serve two: business and consumer. Certain things are easily positioned: xBox is definitely not going to be a business-friendly device and SharePoint/Office 2010 are not going to be truly consumer-based products.

But a tablet? That has to be both. From what I've seen on Windows Phone 7, it's definitely on that track, but killing what could be the first non-phone based use for it, might hurt it more than help.

Apple has always taken a "we've just changed the world" approach with their products, not without reason. But their community (and the press by in large) accepts the first product as almost perfection, and then gets all excited by the next iteration of the product, which finally delivers on some of the promise.

Microsoft's strength is in its re-iterative improvement. Guy Kawasaki once said, with Microsoft, quality is job 1.1 (he may have pulled that from another source, but it's definitely published in a number of his books). Funny - isn't that the argument agile uses to improve development processes? There is nothing wrong with a re-iterative approach.

Apple seems to be accepting that it constantly needs to re-iterate its software now that millions of people are using it. Heck, through the iPhone app store, I have some apps that have received over 5 updates since I first installed them. Microsoft has done that for years. Now that consumers are finally getting used to it, they seem to be pulling back from it.

I hope they killed the Courier project so they could re-use (or license) parts of it to have a killer tablet. There is a lot of research that goes on at MS that doesn't always make it into the public eye, then there is the research and technology that creates great applications. I hope this is one of the former; not the latter. Who knows? Maybe HTC is looking at building a Windows Phone 7 tablet.

Yes - I'm aware of the WePad (which will run Android) but it's not available until July..looks cool but we have to wait and see.
Does anyone use the Touchbook? Granted, there's no multi-touch and it's a hybrid laptop. There's one review here.


Game Geek said…
Did Microsoft ever confirm that the Courier was a real product in development? Seems to me, they always said it was a research project.

As for an Android tablet, I wouldn't be surprised to see one. We know about the Android phone, but did you know the Barnes & Noble Nook is Android-based? It's not a tablet, but shows that a full tablet could be done.
Andrew MacNeill said…
I certainly expect us to see a true Android Tablet. I knew that the Nook was Android-based - forgot to mention it; but it is a one-trick pony. Let's see a "real" tablet.

Re Courier, no - they never said it was a real product - just a research product - but the timing of the announcements was just well, weird. We haven't seen any of the real Windows 7 tablets yet and the ones everyone wants to see aren't going to be there anymore.

Good points tho.

Popular posts from this blog

Well, that explains CodePlex...

In a move that will be sure to anger open source (or rather anti-paid software, anti-Microsoft open source)  zealots, Microsoft is planning to buy GitHub . A year ago, I mused about why Microsoft would shut down CodePlex and how the world needs competing source code repositories to be strong. I'm not the only one per this Slashdot article  : "...   people have warned about GitHub becoming as large as it did as problematic because it concentrates too much of the power to make or break the open source world in a single entity, moreso because there were valid questions about GitHubs financial viability...." - Jacques Mattheij I will be interested in seeing this play out - whether developers jump ship or not. Have all the efforts Microsoft has made in pushing towards open source be seen as genuine or will all the zealots jump ship or maybe even attack? Microsoft's comment about why they shut down CodePlex referred to how spammers were using CodePlex. Well, GitHub

Attending Southwest Fox 2019 could change your life - Find out how

Southwest Fox is coming up in October and as I do every year, I spoke with the organizers Rick , Doug and Tamar on the FoxShow. Deadlines for Southwest Fox: Super-saver price (before July 1): $695 Early-bird price (before August 1): $770 Regular price (August 1 and later): $820 This year, I took a different approach with separate shows for each organizer but the main message is still the same : July 1st is their Go/No-Go date. Conferences don't talk about this very often. I don't think developers really question if Apple will hold their WWDC in June or Microsoft will hold their Build conference - but that's because those conferences are vendor-led. Southwest Fox is a community-driven conference - it's not driven by a company with an agenda. Listen to the interviews and you can hear how important each of the organizers feel the live connection between speakers and among attendees.

Virtual FoxFest - A New Way to Conference

If you haven't been keeping up with the news around the Fox community, the Southwest Fox conference has gone digital now showing up as  Virtual FoxFest .  At $49, it's a steal and a great way to learn some new ideas and get inspired. While the reasoning for this change is fairly obvious with the year of COVID - for me, this is something that has been a long time coming. I appreciate many people's needs for a physical conference but the world is very large and it's difficult to get people from around the world into a single physical location. I recently attended a single-track conference via YouTube (a Quasar conference). YouTube's Live stream provided a very handy way to watch, rewind and communicate with people online. While Tamar, Doug and Rick are still making decisions related to the streaming platform, there are lots of great options available. I'm really looking forward to it. The FoxPro community has also really felt its international roots