Skip to main content

What companies plan their purchases strategically?

Craig Bailey posted this link on Twitter regarding Sun's lacklustre performance last quarter -
Jonathan Schwartz's Blog: Our Q3

Choice quotes:

"Why don't you just stop giving your software away?

Because we prioritize developer adoption. Let me give an example....the MySQL team had scored a design win - ahead of the proprietary competition. What should we have charged them beforehand? No matter what it was, they wouldn't have used the product - startups and developers don't pay for software...We didn't pay them, the MySQL team earned their adoption."

"Why does Sun's CEO waste time writing that blog?
Because I believe in providing clarity surrounding our strategy and operations - not just once a year in the Annual Report. I believe clarity behind our direction is useful for our shareholders, customers, partners and employees."

It's a great post, full of honesty (as far as I can tell) about what's going on at Sun and it contrasts with the Microsoft/Yahoo debacle.

The most disappointing thing I have heard regarding the proposed (now dropped) merger was Balmer's assertion that he wasn't buying Yahoo for the technologies but rather simply for the online advertising business. While I can appreciate that to some extent (there was a fair bit of overlap) , it's also a bit strange because both companies are now getting known for their ability to scoop up companies and then let them languish. I think Microsoft does a far better job of integrating their purchases into their entire system (consider FoxPro into SQL and other technologies) but some obviously don't think so.

Microsoft does a great job with their development tools and getting the message out (Rock the Launch was a great example of that) - but their direction can be spotty or there is a rush to get something out and then to correct it later.  And yet, there are lots of technologies within Microsoft just dying to see the light of day, be they internally-developed or purchased.

There was a FoxPro devcon quite a few years ago when the mantra was not "Fox Rocks" but rather "Challenge Me" - the premise being that you could do virtually anything with FoxPro.

Microsoft continues to do that but it seems, to me at any rate, that it's in areas that they are already behind the curve. As a result, it's seen as a "me too". Consider that Yahoo introduced Pipes before PopFly and even though they are different, they are also similar enough to let people make a connection.  As Joel Spolsky wrote, even Mesh seems like something that's been done before.

Where is the Excel 3.0 of the next generation of web apps?

Microsoft - don't just challenge me - challenge yourself. You've done it before - show us you can do it again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FoxInCloud Stats

FoxInCloud sent this link a while back about their statistics regarding visits to their site:

http://foxincloud.com/blog/2017/12/27/VFP-community-lessons-from-foxincloud-site.html



What's interesting here is the breakdown of people. Yes, I think it's understandable that the Fox community is getting older.

Another factor is the growth of the mobile and web environments taking over development. These environments really do push people towards the newer non-SQL or free SQL/hosted environments but more towards hosted storage options like Amazon and Google. A tool like FoxInCloud that helps MOVE existing applications to the cloud inherently competes with those environments.

But FoxInCloud also allows developers to extend their application further by giving them a starting point using Javascript and the basic CSS (such as Bootstrap). If you're not rebuilding your application from scratch, it's certainly a great step forward.

Well, that explains CodePlex...

In a move that will be sure to anger open source (or rather anti-paid software, anti-Microsoft open source)  zealots, Microsoft is planning to buy GitHub.

A year ago, I mused about why Microsoft would shut down CodePlex and how the world needs competing source code repositories to be strong. I'm not the only one per this Slashdot article :
"...people have warned about GitHub becoming as large as it did as problematic because it concentrates too much of the power to make or break the open source world in a single entity, moreso because there were valid questions about GitHubs financial viability...." - Jacques Mattheij

I will be interested in seeing this play out - whether developers jump ship or not. Have all the efforts Microsoft has made in pushing towards open source be seen as genuine or will all the zealots jump ship or maybe even attack?

Microsoft's comment about why they shut down CodePlex referred to how spammers were using CodePlex. Well, GitHub has its own …

The World of Updates Today

I just received an update for Office 365. It certainly includes some cool features - including starting in one environment and picking it up in another environment. In recent years, I've certainly enjoined the use of Continuity on a Mac and in fact, I feel spoiled being able to start a message in one environment (even Google) and then finish it off on another.  This has become some pervasive when we were reviewing our most recent backlog at a client site, a similar feature was added to the current workload.

But with web applications, the trend is to reduce the amount of software on a client machine. I used to have automatic backup for all of my machines (thanks Carbonite!) but these days, many of my machines don't need anything beyond the core OS and some basic applications. Certainly that's the feeling with Chromebooks and even the lightweight aspect of many iOS apps. The functionality is mostly in the cloud.

When you upgrade your system, you expect it to a big update. So…