Skip to main content

Using Debugger Configuration files

Andy Kramek has a great post explaining Form Event Sequences in VFP and while reading it, I was also debugging a piece of code in which I had the fortune (or misfortune) to use the Track Events feature in the Debugger. (what do the two have in common? You can actually see the Form Event Sequences very easily by using the Track Events feature).

Track Events is one of those features that doesn't appear useful until you actually need to use it. The big problem is that you have to spend quite a bit of time either a) selecting each event you want to track OR b) selecting all and then removing the events you don't need to track.

Some basic events whose tracking simply takes up space and I almost always turn off:

One feature that I don't see used that often by other developers is the ability to save the Debug configurations. The debugger typically retains all of the settings from the previous session so why would you need to save a separate configuration, right?

The Debug configuration saves all aspects of your debug environment: your breakpoints, your event tracking and your watch window. But when you're in the heat of development, you may find yourself creating so many breakpoints or watch items that it's hard to keep track of. Here are some reasons you may want to save it:

1) You work on multiple projects (clients?) and want to retain a particular debugging environment for one client while using another for a different client

2) You want to maintain different configurations for different types of debugging sessions (looking for events, waiting for click and valid events, etc).

3) You are working on a particular problem and have to step away for a minute.

So what's in a configuration file?

Debug configuration files have a DBG extension and are simply text files that can be easily parsed or created on the fly. Here's a sample:





Load, RightClick, Valid, When

The DBGCFGVERSION is important. VFP 9 won't load any files that have a value of 4.

The first part is the WATCH area, followed by the BREAKPOINTS.
The Breakpoint type is evaluated as:
0 - Break at location
1 - Break at location if expression is true
2 - Break when expression is true
3 - Break when expression has changed

If you use the Pass setting, it also adds a PASS=xxx setting within the BREAKPOINT area.

One thing that DOESN't get saved in the DBG file is what debug windows were open. Also note that if you choose Restore to Default from the Window menu, it doesn't just restore the windows to their default position, it clears out all of the settings as well - another reason to save your commonly used debug configurations for future use.

How do you use the debug configuration files?


Rick Schummer said…
One of my favorite things to do with the Debug Config file is to sort the Watches. I have wished Microsoft would add new watches to the top of the list so I don't have to scroll down to see the newest one. If you save the Debug Config you can rearrange the Watches in the text file, and reload. Now the watches are in the sequence I prefer.
Andrew MacNeill said…
Great idea.

Almost wish we had extensibility in the debugger for some of these things but I imagine you could build it into your project manager or a separate sub menu
Tamar E. Granor said…
Just want to point out that combining Event Tracking with the DEBUGOUT command can be incredibly useful. It lets you see what's firing and get information about what's going on inside those (or other) methods.

Popular posts from this blog

Well, that explains CodePlex...

In a move that will be sure to anger open source (or rather anti-paid software, anti-Microsoft open source)  zealots, Microsoft is planning to buy GitHub.

A year ago, I mused about why Microsoft would shut down CodePlex and how the world needs competing source code repositories to be strong. I'm not the only one per this Slashdot article :
"...people have warned about GitHub becoming as large as it did as problematic because it concentrates too much of the power to make or break the open source world in a single entity, moreso because there were valid questions about GitHubs financial viability...." - Jacques Mattheij

I will be interested in seeing this play out - whether developers jump ship or not. Have all the efforts Microsoft has made in pushing towards open source be seen as genuine or will all the zealots jump ship or maybe even attack?

Microsoft's comment about why they shut down CodePlex referred to how spammers were using CodePlex. Well, GitHub has its own …

FoxInCloud Stats

FoxInCloud sent this link a while back about their statistics regarding visits to their site:

What's interesting here is the breakdown of people. Yes, I think it's understandable that the Fox community is getting older.

Another factor is the growth of the mobile and web environments taking over development. These environments really do push people towards the newer non-SQL or free SQL/hosted environments but more towards hosted storage options like Amazon and Google. A tool like FoxInCloud that helps MOVE existing applications to the cloud inherently competes with those environments.

But FoxInCloud also allows developers to extend their application further by giving them a starting point using Javascript and the basic CSS (such as Bootstrap). If you're not rebuilding your application from scratch, it's certainly a great step forward.

The World of Updates Today

I just received an update for Office 365. It certainly includes some cool features - including starting in one environment and picking it up in another environment. In recent years, I've certainly enjoined the use of Continuity on a Mac and in fact, I feel spoiled being able to start a message in one environment (even Google) and then finish it off on another.  This has become some pervasive when we were reviewing our most recent backlog at a client site, a similar feature was added to the current workload.

But with web applications, the trend is to reduce the amount of software on a client machine. I used to have automatic backup for all of my machines (thanks Carbonite!) but these days, many of my machines don't need anything beyond the core OS and some basic applications. Certainly that's the feeling with Chromebooks and even the lightweight aspect of many iOS apps. The functionality is mostly in the cloud.

When you upgrade your system, you expect it to a big update. So…