Skip to main content

Microsoft goes cross-platform with .Net - why not FoxPro?

Since Microsoft is going cross-platform with Silverlight and DotNet, it seems that instead of only encouraging Microsoft to reconsider VFP development, some energy might be better spent encouraging them to open up the VFP Eula to allow running on other platforms (such as done via the WINE project).



Some reasons to consider this:



1. It would not require Microsoft to deploy additional development resources into FoxPro - instead, it would require some legal resources to make a fairer licensing agreement.



2. Developers who have been looking for ways of deploying their local data applications on Linux have had to ignore the Microsoft name. If VFP applications were able to run on Linux, it could offer more credence to other Microsoft's initiatives on those platforms.



3. You can do it already - save for the EULA. Whil Hentzen has shown this years ago. At that time, Microsoft then re-did their EULA preventing you from running VFP apps on anything other than a Windows desktop. But if Microsoft wants to go to great lengths in showing how "open" they are to other platforms, what better way than to free-up the current licenses that prevent this openness from showing forth.



Note: the issue in the EULA is under Distribution Restrictions which says "you may not....



distribute any distributable code that runs on any platform other than the Windows platform"



(as noted here)



I know there are many reasons why Microsoft will not do this - BUT, I bring it up simply as an alternative to attempting to persuade Microsoft to re-develop FoxPro - to allow a rich development tool be available everywhere it can be. Just a thought.



Microsoft Silverlight: Light Up the Web



Powered by ScribeFire.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FoxInCloud Stats

FoxInCloud sent this link a while back about their statistics regarding visits to their site:

http://foxincloud.com/blog/2017/12/27/VFP-community-lessons-from-foxincloud-site.html



What's interesting here is the breakdown of people. Yes, I think it's understandable that the Fox community is getting older.

Another factor is the growth of the mobile and web environments taking over development. These environments really do push people towards the newer non-SQL or free SQL/hosted environments but more towards hosted storage options like Amazon and Google. A tool like FoxInCloud that helps MOVE existing applications to the cloud inherently competes with those environments.

But FoxInCloud also allows developers to extend their application further by giving them a starting point using Javascript and the basic CSS (such as Bootstrap). If you're not rebuilding your application from scratch, it's certainly a great step forward.

Well, that explains CodePlex...

In a move that will be sure to anger open source (or rather anti-paid software, anti-Microsoft open source)  zealots, Microsoft is planning to buy GitHub.

A year ago, I mused about why Microsoft would shut down CodePlex and how the world needs competing source code repositories to be strong. I'm not the only one per this Slashdot article :
"...people have warned about GitHub becoming as large as it did as problematic because it concentrates too much of the power to make or break the open source world in a single entity, moreso because there were valid questions about GitHubs financial viability...." - Jacques Mattheij

I will be interested in seeing this play out - whether developers jump ship or not. Have all the efforts Microsoft has made in pushing towards open source be seen as genuine or will all the zealots jump ship or maybe even attack?

Microsoft's comment about why they shut down CodePlex referred to how spammers were using CodePlex. Well, GitHub has its own …

The World of Updates Today

I just received an update for Office 365. It certainly includes some cool features - including starting in one environment and picking it up in another environment. In recent years, I've certainly enjoined the use of Continuity on a Mac and in fact, I feel spoiled being able to start a message in one environment (even Google) and then finish it off on another.  This has become some pervasive when we were reviewing our most recent backlog at a client site, a similar feature was added to the current workload.

But with web applications, the trend is to reduce the amount of software on a client machine. I used to have automatic backup for all of my machines (thanks Carbonite!) but these days, many of my machines don't need anything beyond the core OS and some basic applications. Certainly that's the feeling with Chromebooks and even the lightweight aspect of many iOS apps. The functionality is mostly in the cloud.

When you upgrade your system, you expect it to a big update. So…