Skip to main content

What Defines a Release?

It's been a week over 10 days since the VFP Roadmap was first published and the opening keynote at the FoxPro DevCon has helped (or not for some) clear the muddy waters.

According to the notes taken from Alex and David, the VFP Team expects Sedna to look like:

* Limited core product updates
* New and improved XBase components
* .NET wrapper classes for use with VFP
* Additional product DLLs for extensibility

(this is similar to the notes published by John Koziol in the Universal thread). From Alex, "The most important theme I got from the meeting was Microsoft's VFP Group keen interest in hearing from us, the community on what direction this should take."

Malcolm Greene made a comment on the Talking Fox about the Fox Team's track record and how he would take a service pack over a full release any day.

I agree with that statement and it got me thinking about what actually defines a release. If you look at the way many products tend to get released, you often see a release that introduces major changes, followed by a release that "adjusts". These "adjustments" are more recently called "service packs" primarily because the focus of the update is very targeted. However, some would argue that the Windows XP SP2 was just as critical as a major update because it changed a lot of the standard behavior.

The difference between a service pack and a new release is also a great deal in the marketing. When a new product gets released, an awful lot goes into packaging and marketing of the product (no snipes about MS marketing VFP, please). VFP 9's mantra was no limits and it touched upon almost every area of the product. Although the Report Writer enhancements are certainly one of the most visible changes, there were changes in the SQL engine, designers, etc. The hooks that were put in created a framework for changes that could be made without requiring major changes in the engine.

The focus on Sedna is interoperability with DotNet. While VFP purists may consider it a shift, the statistics noted at DevCon show that the majority of FoxPro developers are integrating it with other environments, be it the web, DotNet or Office. So now, it makes sense to focus on better working with other systems, in the same way that VFP 6 made COM easier to manage.

But back to my point of what defines a release. Gone are the days when a product was made up of a single EXE and some minor files - I installed Cropper yesterday which uses DotNet and while the EXE was only 60 K, there were over 10 additional DLLs that added to the file size. VFP is no different and if the Fox Team can achieve their goal of VFP working better with DotNet and Longhorn (it looked like the Avalon demo was particularly cool), without having to update anything in the core product, that says a lot for the environment. Call it VFP 9 (SR) (Sedna Release) or whatever.

Is a release defined by how developers use the product or by the applications that they develop with it?

Recall that Rick Strahl took what was considered a desktop application and made it into a powerful web server, a local database tool now serves data from the larger database servers, a tool that was originally written as a scripting language has grown into the tool we use today. For every commercial FoxPro tool out there, there are a number of other public domain or open solutions.

What we have been seeing in the past few years is how Microsoft is taking that same approach of "what can we build without having to change the core" and letting their team and the entire community build from it. As I think more about it, Sedna is really the next step in that. If they succeed in building Sedna without touching the core engine (post Service Pack 1), it will be a testament to the original design from which Visual FoxPro (and FoxPro itself) was first built, one that very much feels like an open-source community for a commercial product.

Whether you call it a release, or a service pack or whatever, shipping an update is just like shipping a release, but typically without the fanfare and the Fox Team has produced some absolutely amazing functionality in the past and the demos discussed hint at great things to come with Sedna.

What we do with it is what is of most importance.


Anonymous said…
... And "Without a fanfare" is the way we know VFP is released anyway :-)

Popular posts from this blog

Well, that explains CodePlex...

In a move that will be sure to anger open source (or rather anti-paid software, anti-Microsoft open source)  zealots, Microsoft is planning to buy GitHub . A year ago, I mused about why Microsoft would shut down CodePlex and how the world needs competing source code repositories to be strong. I'm not the only one per this Slashdot article  : "...   people have warned about GitHub becoming as large as it did as problematic because it concentrates too much of the power to make or break the open source world in a single entity, moreso because there were valid questions about GitHubs financial viability...." - Jacques Mattheij I will be interested in seeing this play out - whether developers jump ship or not. Have all the efforts Microsoft has made in pushing towards open source be seen as genuine or will all the zealots jump ship or maybe even attack? Microsoft's comment about why they shut down CodePlex referred to how spammers were using CodePlex. Well, GitHub

Attending Southwest Fox 2019 could change your life - Find out how

Southwest Fox is coming up in October and as I do every year, I spoke with the organizers Rick , Doug and Tamar on the FoxShow. Deadlines for Southwest Fox: Super-saver price (before July 1): $695 Early-bird price (before August 1): $770 Regular price (August 1 and later): $820 This year, I took a different approach with separate shows for each organizer but the main message is still the same : July 1st is their Go/No-Go date. Conferences don't talk about this very often. I don't think developers really question if Apple will hold their WWDC in June or Microsoft will hold their Build conference - but that's because those conferences are vendor-led. Southwest Fox is a community-driven conference - it's not driven by a company with an agenda. Listen to the interviews and you can hear how important each of the organizers feel the live connection between speakers and among attendees.

Virtual FoxFest - A New Way to Conference

If you haven't been keeping up with the news around the Fox community, the Southwest Fox conference has gone digital now showing up as  Virtual FoxFest .  At $49, it's a steal and a great way to learn some new ideas and get inspired. While the reasoning for this change is fairly obvious with the year of COVID - for me, this is something that has been a long time coming. I appreciate many people's needs for a physical conference but the world is very large and it's difficult to get people from around the world into a single physical location. I recently attended a single-track conference via YouTube (a Quasar conference). YouTube's Live stream provided a very handy way to watch, rewind and communicate with people online. While Tamar, Doug and Rick are still making decisions related to the streaming platform, there are lots of great options available. I'm really looking forward to it. The FoxPro community has also really felt its international roots