Skip to main content

Wizards are for Dungeons and Dragons

Jeez - I go heads down into work for 2 days and missed this great post on Thursday by Joe Wilcox on the Microsoft Monitor.

Whenever I give Visual FoxPro training, I almost always skip over the Wizards except for one: the reporting wizard but for the most part I agree with this article.

Instead, the Builder or Helper approach is much more straight forward. A Wizard typically "does it all" but how many steps make up a good Wizard UI?

Traditionally, Wizards have at least three screens: a welcome, a to do and a finish. Well - get rid of the Welcome and now you're left with two. In those cases, I think it makes very good sense to get rid of the Wizard - it's simply not needed. The Add Hardware wizard sometimes really bugs me - it says 'I'm hear to add your hardware" and then almost instantly "I'm done." Why not just add it automatically?

I used to like putting in Wizards for some of my more advanced configurations - because they needed to use users specific questions. If you have 50 options that need to be set, you likely don't need to ask about each one - you only need to ask about 5 to 10 questions - but it could almost be like the Property pages these days - where you have a Basic property that shows 10 options and then an advanced that shows all of the options.

A Wizard approach to 50 questions might have 10 different steps - and that's just way too many. The original Foxfire! setup wizard had a great feature - it SAVED the configuration and allowed users to come back to it before committing it. But now, in recent versions, the tools themselves have gotten better so they only need one or two steps and if that's the case, why do you need a Wizard at all.

Wizards used to be great when the underlying tools were simply too complicated to use. But now with plug and play and developers actually taking the time to make that lower level much more accessible - they are effectively a hindrance.

The bigger problem I have with Wizards is that they "do it all" and don't tell you what they did. Builders , at least in the VFP world, do something for you but what they did is obvious.

I'm sure there are some exceptions that one could find but I don't see why a better Wizard UI would have two approaches:

1. A Basic and advanced viewing of settings
2. A Builder approach. I don't think anyone wants to hand-write the code generated by the RI Builder but it's great that you have EASY access to it afterwards.

You tell me - do you use a Wizard approach in your applications for hard to do stuff?

Take my poll and let me know.

Microsoft Monitor: Wizards are for Dungeons and Dragons

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Well, that explains CodePlex...

In a move that will be sure to anger open source (or rather anti-paid software, anti-Microsoft open source)  zealots, Microsoft is planning to buy GitHub.

A year ago, I mused about why Microsoft would shut down CodePlex and how the world needs competing source code repositories to be strong. I'm not the only one per this Slashdot article :
"...people have warned about GitHub becoming as large as it did as problematic because it concentrates too much of the power to make or break the open source world in a single entity, moreso because there were valid questions about GitHubs financial viability...." - Jacques Mattheij

I will be interested in seeing this play out - whether developers jump ship or not. Have all the efforts Microsoft has made in pushing towards open source be seen as genuine or will all the zealots jump ship or maybe even attack?

Microsoft's comment about why they shut down CodePlex referred to how spammers were using CodePlex. Well, GitHub has its own …

FoxInCloud Stats

FoxInCloud sent this link a while back about their statistics regarding visits to their site:

http://foxincloud.com/blog/2017/12/27/VFP-community-lessons-from-foxincloud-site.html



What's interesting here is the breakdown of people. Yes, I think it's understandable that the Fox community is getting older.

Another factor is the growth of the mobile and web environments taking over development. These environments really do push people towards the newer non-SQL or free SQL/hosted environments but more towards hosted storage options like Amazon and Google. A tool like FoxInCloud that helps MOVE existing applications to the cloud inherently competes with those environments.

But FoxInCloud also allows developers to extend their application further by giving them a starting point using Javascript and the basic CSS (such as Bootstrap). If you're not rebuilding your application from scratch, it's certainly a great step forward.

Attending Southwest Fox 2019 could change your life - Find out how

Southwest Fox is coming up in October and as I do every year, I spoke with the organizers Rick, Doug and Tamar on the FoxShow.

Deadlines for Southwest Fox:
Super-saver price (before July 1): $695
Early-bird price (before August 1): $770
Regular price (August 1 and later): $820
This year, I took a different approach with separate shows for each organizer but the main message is still the same : July 1st is their Go/No-Go date.

Conferences don't talk about this very often. I don't think developers really question if Apple will hold their WWDC in June or Microsoft will hold their Build conference - but that's because those conferences are vendor-led.

Southwest Fox is a community-driven conference - it's not driven by a company with an agenda. Listen to the interviews and you can hear how important each of the organizers feel the live connection between speakers and among attendees.