Skip to main content

Reinstalling DotNet/ASPNet on a Windows 2003 Server

So much for getting rid of DLL hell...I've just been through hell and back trying to re-install the DotNet framework to run properly with SourceGear's Dragnet product.

We were experiencing some problems that only popped us running IE (FireFox was fine) and the suggestion was to reinstall DotNet. Oh sure. no problem -just go to Windows Installer right?

Wrong - apparently the service packs don't show up under Add/Remove programs with a good name. Redownloaded DotNetFX again , thinking I should be able to install over it. Sorry - "This has already been installed on your OS." (Win 2003).

Why is that? Because Windows 2003 comes WITH the DotNet framework built in. This means that you can't simply "remove it" and then "reinstall it". But there is a solution. Read on.

Based on some other useful sites, I turned on Windows Installer Logging so I could see that the message was when I tried to install it - maybe I could find out where the culprit was that way. No luck. The log file simply said "Looking for MSI.DLL" and then "Cannot install." Don't bother doing that.

There must be an easier way. So I uninstalled any product I knew that used DotNet, hoping that would get rid of the dependencies. Still no luck. Even went through the Registry, removing entries pointing to DotNet. Still no luck.

Finally came across a useful MSDN KB article about repairing corrupted installs (funny how it didn't turn up on any search engines - Google and MSN have to really start filtering out the sites that simply repeat other KB articles).

C:\DOTNETFX.EXE /t:C:\temp /c:"msiexec /i c:\temp\netfx.msi REINSTALL=ALL ReinstallMODE=vomus"

It said it installed just fine. Full install - no problem. Why wouldn't it simply do this without having wasted the better part of the morning?

Why not? Because it STILL didn't fix it. I still get an internal error 2908 on Microsoft.VisualBasic.VCA,Version="7.0.50000.0",PublicKeyToken="b03f5f7f11d50a3a",Culture="neutral",FileVersion="7.10.3052.4",
Hresult: 0x8002802F. Please refer to Help and Support for more information.

This seems like it should be pretty straight forward to me. I simply want to reinstall the software.

Finally, posted a question on the framework.setup newsgroup and Blair Neumann from Microsoft pointed me to the right KB article.

1. Repair your Windows 2003 server. (that's a nasty piece of work)
2. Hack the registry (just a little) and rerun some installers.

Sure, you have to hack the registry a little but after I did that, everything seemed to be good except for one little thing: my Dragnet app still didn't work.

Somewhere in my adventures, "something" had turned off support for ASP.Net. Where do you fix this?

IIS Manager (INETMGR) - Web Service Extensions - make sure that ASP.Net is Allowed and not prohibited.

It was a frustrating adventure but there was light at the end of the tunnel.

What did I really learn from all this? 1) Sometimes the best searches simply suck at finding the root cause of the problem and 2) a checklist somewhere would be valuable for doing these repairs

Real Checklist for verifying AspNet is working properly on a Windows 2003 server
1. Verify in IIS that ASP.Net web service extension is Allowed.
2. If it is, and something's still not working right, re-register it. Go to the \WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322 folder and run:

aspnet_regiis -i

aspnet_regiis -c (note the -c didn't seem to work on my version but you can also do it with an -r to reinstall)
3. If it's STILL not working, repair your Windows 2003 server and then recheck.
4. Still not working, go to the KB article (luckily, you'll only have to do the Registry hacking step as you've done the other step (repairing the server)).

Not fun - and very frustrating but at least now it works. Hopefully this post will make it easier for those who come across it again on their own.


Anonymous said…
excellent stuff, spent 2 hours trying to sort an issue i was having. then after finally finding this article i had it sorted in five minutes
Anonymous said…
Thank you for posting this. Saved my day.
Anonymous said…
Had the same problem. Found the source and fixed it.
Compare wwwroot\aspnet_client\system_web\1_1_4322\WebUIValidation.js
on the 2003 server and on a server that works (or your development machine). Mine were different. Replaced a javascript function on the 2003 server with the one off my machine. Here is the working version of this function that should be replaced on the 2003 server:
function ValidatorCommonOnSubmit() {
var result = !Page_BlockSubmit;
Page_BlockSubmit = false;
event.returnValue = result;
return result;

Good luck.
Anonymous said…
Forgot to mention, you will probably have to wait a while for the fix to work it's way through whatever caching IIS and IE are doing.
Austin Amuok said…
Thanks, this article came in real handy when i was scratching my head in my quandry. Thanks! Hongera!!

Austin Amuok
Unknown said…
A making linq work on Mono with Mysql was another difficult challenge if you preferred the mono way, and then Mono team fixed it, but it still had some bugs -it's always a rollercoaster.

dotnet training in chennai

Popular posts from this blog

Attending Southwest Fox 2019 could change your life - Find out how

Southwest Fox is coming up in October and as I do every year, I spoke with the organizers Rick , Doug and Tamar on the FoxShow. Deadlines for Southwest Fox: Super-saver price (before July 1): $695 Early-bird price (before August 1): $770 Regular price (August 1 and later): $820 This year, I took a different approach with separate shows for each organizer but the main message is still the same : July 1st is their Go/No-Go date. Conferences don't talk about this very often. I don't think developers really question if Apple will hold their WWDC in June or Microsoft will hold their Build conference - but that's because those conferences are vendor-led. Southwest Fox is a community-driven conference - it's not driven by a company with an agenda. Listen to the interviews and you can hear how important each of the organizers feel the live connection between speakers and among attendees.

Well, that explains CodePlex...

In a move that will be sure to anger open source (or rather anti-paid software, anti-Microsoft open source)  zealots, Microsoft is planning to buy GitHub . A year ago, I mused about why Microsoft would shut down CodePlex and how the world needs competing source code repositories to be strong. I'm not the only one per this Slashdot article  : "...   people have warned about GitHub becoming as large as it did as problematic because it concentrates too much of the power to make or break the open source world in a single entity, moreso because there were valid questions about GitHubs financial viability...." - Jacques Mattheij I will be interested in seeing this play out - whether developers jump ship or not. Have all the efforts Microsoft has made in pushing towards open source be seen as genuine or will all the zealots jump ship or maybe even attack? Microsoft's comment about why they shut down CodePlex referred to how spammers were using CodePlex. Well, GitHub

FoxInCloud Stats

FoxInCloud sent this link a while back about their statistics regarding visits to their site: What's interesting here is the breakdown of people. Yes, I think it's understandable that the Fox community is getting older. Another factor is the growth of the mobile and web environments taking over development. These environments really do push people towards the newer non-SQL or free SQL/hosted environments but more towards hosted storage options like Amazon and Google. A tool like FoxInCloud that helps MOVE existing applications to the cloud inherently competes with those environments. But FoxInCloud also allows developers to extend their application further by giving them a starting point using Javascript and the basic CSS (such as Bootstrap). If you're not rebuilding your application from scratch, it's certainly a great step forward. FoxPro VFP