Skip to main content

Beware of how the FILTER() works

Some older applications use the FILTER ( ) function in Visual FoxPro to identify what the current filter on a file is.
Be warned that what this function returns isn't always what a filter was originally set to.
Here are some examples:
SET FILTER TO region<>"NC"
? FILTER ( )
This Returns region#"NC"
But it gets better than this:
SET FILTER TO (company_name!="Alfred" OR region<>"NC") AND country = "United States"
Returns (COMPANY_NAME#"Alfred".OR.REGION#"NC").AND.COUNTRY="United States"
For most cases, this won't hurt anyone's code but it's a real pain when you're trying to translate the FILTER() statement to match an original filter. For example, in one application, we have a table that looks like this:
cDesc C(30)
cFilter M
The cDesc field contains a friendly name like "Important Customers" or "Customers who I need to call" and the filter contains a valid FoxPro expression.
The problem is unless you store the variable of the Desc somewhere else, you'll never be able to properly identify what the description is without major work. What kind of work? Well, here's a sample of some code:
lcRealFilter = UPPER(ALLTRIM(FILTER() ))

FOR lnI=1 TO ALEN(laFilters,1)


IF lcValue==lcFilter
** Match found



(Note: no - this code isn't optimized!)

But then I also have to check all of these individual conditions:

lcValue=STRTRAN(lcValue,' OR ','.OR.')
lcValue=STRTRAN(lcValue,' $ ','$')
lcValue=STRTRAN(lcValue,' AND ','.AND.')
lcValue = STRTRAN(lcValue,"<>","#")
lcValue = STRTRAN(lcValue,"!=","#")
lcValue = STRTRAN(lcValue,"!",".NOT.")

It's not pretty but it works. Are there any others? Let me know.


Popular posts from this blog

FoxInCloud Stats

FoxInCloud sent this link a while back about their statistics regarding visits to their site:

What's interesting here is the breakdown of people. Yes, I think it's understandable that the Fox community is getting older.

Another factor is the growth of the mobile and web environments taking over development. These environments really do push people towards the newer non-SQL or free SQL/hosted environments but more towards hosted storage options like Amazon and Google. A tool like FoxInCloud that helps MOVE existing applications to the cloud inherently competes with those environments.

But FoxInCloud also allows developers to extend their application further by giving them a starting point using Javascript and the basic CSS (such as Bootstrap). If you're not rebuilding your application from scratch, it's certainly a great step forward.

Well, that explains CodePlex...

In a move that will be sure to anger open source (or rather anti-paid software, anti-Microsoft open source)  zealots, Microsoft is planning to buy GitHub.

A year ago, I mused about why Microsoft would shut down CodePlex and how the world needs competing source code repositories to be strong. I'm not the only one per this Slashdot article :
"...people have warned about GitHub becoming as large as it did as problematic because it concentrates too much of the power to make or break the open source world in a single entity, moreso because there were valid questions about GitHubs financial viability...." - Jacques Mattheij

I will be interested in seeing this play out - whether developers jump ship or not. Have all the efforts Microsoft has made in pushing towards open source be seen as genuine or will all the zealots jump ship or maybe even attack?

Microsoft's comment about why they shut down CodePlex referred to how spammers were using CodePlex. Well, GitHub has its own …

The World of Updates Today

I just received an update for Office 365. It certainly includes some cool features - including starting in one environment and picking it up in another environment. In recent years, I've certainly enjoined the use of Continuity on a Mac and in fact, I feel spoiled being able to start a message in one environment (even Google) and then finish it off on another.  This has become some pervasive when we were reviewing our most recent backlog at a client site, a similar feature was added to the current workload.

But with web applications, the trend is to reduce the amount of software on a client machine. I used to have automatic backup for all of my machines (thanks Carbonite!) but these days, many of my machines don't need anything beyond the core OS and some basic applications. Certainly that's the feeling with Chromebooks and even the lightweight aspect of many iOS apps. The functionality is mostly in the cloud.

When you upgrade your system, you expect it to a big update. So…