Skip to main content

Cleaning the Roomba: RTFSWS

Early last year, I purchased a Roomba (one of those robotic vacuum cleaners that whip around on the floor). Great device! I had some problems with one unit and their customer service sent me a new one out without any hesitation.

Last week, Trish was noting that it didn't seem to be charging properly. I reverified the cord and it worked fine.

Then yesterday, she said "it doesn't work. he starts and then just stops." There was nothing in the user guide (gasp!) on it except "clean the brushes" so after cleaning it out (yes, we do this after EVERY use), I went into Self-test mode to see if that would solve it. Nope - everything seemed to check out. After searching some posts from other users (some positive and some negative), I decided when all else fails, RTFWS - Read the Freaking Support Web Site.

Sure enough - there it was. The Roomba's sensors are all really well placed except for the left one, which is right above one of the brushes - (it uses the sensors for movement and there are left open presumably for more accurate checks). With three dogs and a cat, you can only imagine how dirty it would get. Sure enough, cleaned it out with a little air and a damp cloth, and Rover (the Roomba) was off on his merry way, spinning and turning as he cleaned the floor.

Over the years, I've had a number of vacuum cleaners from expensive ($1500) to dirt cheap ($50), for $200US, the Roomba is well worth the value but be aware: it has to be cleaned just like a computer. If Roomba could do one little thing to improve this device, it would be to provide better tools or technologies for cleaning the Roomba (granted I haven't seen the latest Discovery model).

Include a little screwdriver for undoing the brushes, provide a little brush for cleaning those hard to reach areas, maybe include (or suggest) a can of compressed air - but perhaps most importantly, have the Roomba itself tell you when those sensors are dirty. Most people wouldn't think to look there and its not mentioned clearly in the user guide.


Popular posts from this blog

Programmers vs. Developers vs. Architects

I received an email this morning from Brandon Savage's newsletter. Brandon's a PHP guru (works at Mozilla) but his newsletter and books have some great overall perspectives for developers of all languages. However, this last one (What's the difference between developers and architects?) kind of rubs me the wrong way. Either that, or I've just missed the natural inflation of job descriptions. (maybe, it's like the change in terminology between Garbage man and Waste Engineer or Secretary and Office Administrator)

So maybe it's just me - but I think there's still a big difference between Programmer, Developer and then of course, architect. The key thing here is that every role has a different perspective and every one of those perspectives has value. The original MSF create roles like Product Manager, Program Manager, Developer, Tester, etc - so every concept may pigeon hole people into different roles. But the statements Brandon makes are often distinctions I…

Security in Windows 10

 discusses some Windows 10 privacy settings and their implications.

"Finally, we will access, disclose and preserve personal data, including your content (such as the content of your emails, other private communications or files in private folders), when we have a good faith belief that doing so is necessary." "In other words, Microsoft won't treat your local data with any more privacy than it treats your data on its servers and may upload your local data to its servers arbitrarily"
I did a quick install on a VM choosing the Express settings. When I fully deploy this on a real workstation, I will likely choose to wade through all of the individual pages, as David recommends.

Of course, losing one's privacy is nothing new - it's happening all over the place (despite Santa Ana's police force's lawsu…


I'm not TRYING to be "fanboy-flame bait" but what I saw yesterday was a typical "Do it this way, now do it this way and then we'll go back to this way" all over again.... a move similar to what Microsoft does to developers on an ongoing basis.

Remember the first iPhone? Smooth and curved, at least as far as it could be back then. I still pull out my 3G and can see the curves on it.

Then the 4 came out and "boxy" was all the rage. Everything should be "tight with corners"

Now iPhone 6.... smooth and curvy is back. Granted I don't have the actual device yet, but that's the message.

Guess that means the iPhone 8 will be back to boxy.

And honestly, Apple Watch is not worth "one more thing" --- especially when everyone knows it's going to be shown. "One more thing" would be something no one saw coming.  The device itself ? Very interesting and yes, definitely lots of potential but "one more thing" wor…